Part II - My Letter to Florida's Attorney General

Dr. Deborah Birx's book - Inflating Numbers Artificially & "Asymptomatic Spread"

In Part II, let’s hear from Dr. Marty Makary in his own words — his “disappointment”, inflating case numbers, bad data, and more. Link to the video appears below.

INFLATING NUMBERS ARTIFICIALLY

On Tuesday, July 19, 2022, Dr. Marty Makary, M.D., author, and professor at the Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, spoke with Fox News host, Jesse Watters, on the topic of Dr. Birx’s book.[1] In his opening questioning, Mr. Watters asked Dr. Makary what he thinks of Dr. Birx’s confessional novel. Dr. Makary replies by saying that “…it’s really disappointing…” He continues:

“It turns out that the advice that the President and many of the policy makers got was a small minority opinion. Many of us were looking on saying, ‘What is this 15 days talk?’ The biggest crime (bold/italics added) was not recognizing that the risk was a ten thousand fold risk difference between someone older and someone young and healthy.

“So, they had these indiscriminate policies and now we’re learning that she was basically hiding data. She said it directly in her book. She also said that she thought the “vaccine” would not end the pandemic. It would have been nice of her to say that publicly.”

Admitting that Deborah Birx, Anthony, “TheScience™”, Fauci, and others brought with them biases as a result of their work on HIV, Dr. Makary provides an unprompted explanation of the complete absence of any discussion of natural immunity. As an infection of the immune system, he says, natural immunity does not work with HIV. As a result of these biases, neither the public nor the other policy makers knew that these measures reflected “minority opinions” on how to manage the “COVID” illness.

Dr. Makary goes on to describe how government bureaucrats present and utilize data as “expert opinion” (TheExperts™) to “get something done, an agenda, to get what they want accomplished.”

“Even with the death numbers, she says that the intention – and she said this very clearly, publicly at the time – the intention was to actually count cases with “COVID” as “COVID” deaths. So we know the numbers were being inflated. Look…people die tragically, but you don’t inflate numbers artificially to get an agenda passed.”

You do if you’re Deborah Birx. Even if you die in a car accident and “test” “positive” upon your death for “COVID”, you’re a “COVID” death, asks Mr. Watters. Yes, replies Dr. Makary, confirming that this was being done. He finalizes his comments with the following:

“Not only was it tragic that death numbers were being inflated like that, she said it openly that we’re counting those. Remember, 95% of the “COVID” deaths had four or more co-morbidities, so many times, the co-morbidity was not listed as the death even though it was the true cause of death.” (Bold/italics added)

Dr. Makary confirms that this is still being done and that the CDC still has this “bad data”.[2]

In the context of these tragic deaths, let us also remember that official treatment protocol at the time was no treatment until deathly ill. This turned medicine’s mantra of “early detection, early treatment” on its head. As for Dr. Makary’s lament regarding what Dr. Birx now says about the injection, Dr. Makary may have forgotten that she actually declared in December 2020:

The Internet is forever, Dr. Birx.

“ASYMPTOMATIC SPREAD”

As the lead on a team turning well-established medical protocols and death reporting on their head, Dr. Birx somehow even managed to convince Anthony, “TheScience™”, Fauci that he was wrong when he said in late January 2020…

“…the one thing historically people need to realize is that even if there is some asymptomatic transmission, in all the history of respiratory-borne viruses of any type, ‘asymptomatic transmission’ has never been the driver of outbreaks. The driver of outbreaks is always a symptomatic person. Even if there’s a rare asymptomatic person that might transmit, an epidemic is not driven by asymptomatic carriers.” – Dr. Anthony Fauci, January 28, 2020[3]

Well, that is, up until March 2020 when Dr. Deborah Birx came on the scene. In the case of “COVID-19”, “asymptomatic spread” was the sine qua non for Dr. Birx’s ongoing ploy. Even the healthy/asymptomatic were potential silent carriers of a killer “novel” virus – Dr. Fauci’s factually correct, medically-sound, and historically-accurate reminder notwithstanding.

So what changed? Did all of epidemiology change as a result of this “novel” coronavirus? No…just marketing. Hiding data. Silencing dissenting voices – and the misuse and abuse of PCR.

In Part III, my letter goes through what I call the abuse and misuse of PCR, its erroneous marketing as the “gold standard”, and how its misuse has been a feature of many “pseudo-epidemics” in the past.

---

[1] https://rumble.com/v1cxi99-damning-deborah-birx-admits-she-and-fauci-created-covid-rules-7.19.22.html

[2] Ibid.

[3]