They Lied. We Know They Lied. They Know We Know They Lied -- And Now It's In Writing
European Medicines Agency (EMA) Admits in Writing the Concoctions Are Only for "Immunization," (whatever that means), and Not For Control of Infection or For Preventing Them.
In a November 21, 2023 press conference European Parliament member, Marcel de Graff, recounts shocking (well, not really) admissions by the EMA — in writing — about the modRNA, GMO injectables.
The YouTube above contains the subtitles (as necessary) for this press conference.
From the website, vk.com, here are the “highlights” from the press conference during which MP de Graff recounts portions of the letter he received in response to his earlier correspondence to the EMA requesting “clarification.” Here is that excerpt:
JUST IN (21 Nov 2023)
Press Conference from EU/FvD in the European Parliament led by MP Marcel De Graff @MJRLdeGraaff, , MP Joachim Kuhs @Joachim_Kuhs, , Willem Engel, Dr Vibeke Manniche and Max Schmeling
"Last month, I wrote a letter to the EMA with Joachim Kuhs and six other colleagues from the European Parliament. The European agency responsible for the admission of medicines to the European market. We asked for clarification on the many problems surrounding the corona vaccines. These problems are so great that we asked the EMA to withdraw the market admission. This month, we received an answer from the EMA to our letter. And this answer contains shocking facts. "
"First of all, the EMA explicitly states that it has exclusively allowed the corona vaccines on the market for individual immunizations and absolutely not for the control of infection and absolutely not for preventing or reducing infections. And this is devastating for governments that have gone full circle with the message that you are doing it for someone else."
"In fact, the EMA states that the exposure to the virus increases the chance of infections even in those vaccinated. The mass government campaigns to vaccinate yourself to protect your parents, your neighbors, the weaker in society, were not only unauthorized but also completely nonsense and not based on facts."
"And I remind you once again that we are still fighting with a gigantic so-called unexplained excessive mortality In short, this information from the EMA is destructive to the developed vaccination policy of Rutte and de Jonge. The government knew that the vaccines would not protect against the spread of the virus, but did not share this information with the citizens. On the contrary, it forced the vaccines on our citizens with lies, obscured the side effects, and thus brought the health of everyone who had taken such a vaccine into danger. The vaccination campaigns should be stopped as soon as possible, and it is simply not safe."
"And it does not meet the requirements set by the EMA. And the government and all political parties that supported this should be held accountable for their lies and fraud."
"One of the major considerations for people whether or not to take a vaccine is the possible risks and side effects. EMA mentioned in its letter to us, they expect, I quote, "reports of conditions occurring at or soon after vaccination." End quote. This implies that data on adverse events or side effects within 14 days of vaccinations are of the utmost importance to assess the risks related to the vaccines. However, member state officials adopted the policy that as it would take 10 to 14 days for the vaccine to produce spike proteins, adverse events within 14 days after vaccination were not to be registered as related to the vaccination. Statistically, they considered the person who got the vaccine as not vaccinated within those first 14 days. What a nonsense!"
"To be very clear, the mRNA is non-human and part of a GMO. Moreover, the recent publications on plasmid DNA contamination in these mRNA injection fluids proves beyond doubt that we are dealing with a GMO product. Regardless of the attempts to redefine the term GMO, following an EU court ruling from 2018, any innovation containing or derived from the use of genetic engineering techniques is to be considered the same as a GMO and subject to the same regulatory approval system. Now, integration of bacterial or viral genetic code into the human genome has been associated with a higher risk of cancer."
"The EMA needs to assess all these statistics, the safety, and then take the decision. We demanded from the EMA to withdraw market approval immediately because of all these signals of people dying, of the myocarditis, pericarditis, people with this heart failure, dropping dead on the football field in front of television. That is all related to these vaccines. And that is what has been obscured by bad registration."
-------------------------------------------------------
https://twitter.com/_aussie17/status/1727136510695371..
The drip, drip, drip of the truth can be so frustrating, but it’s happening. It’s happening here, in Australia, in Europe. This is a battle for the ages, my friends, and there are good people out there fighting it with us.
At some point, the sh*t hits the fan and the shenanigans unravel and I am glad I am (and always have been) on the right side of this. I knew from the very beginning that this was BS and fraud. What's sad is, 75% of our society and those across the planet DID NOT and that's really scary when you seriously think about it.
"However, member state officials adopted the policy that as it would take 10 to 14 days for the vaccine to produce spike proteins, adverse events within 14 days after vaccination were not to be registered as related to the vaccination. Statistically, they considered the person who got the vaccine as not vaccinated within those first 14 days. What a nonsense!"
Indeed. It is actually worse as I recall. It is 14 days after the second vaccanation, which was often two to three weeks after the first.