Did You See This on The News? Or Anywhere?

Kind of a Bombshell, but What Came of It?

We’ll begin at the end with this story:

That, of course, means that a direct link to heart inflammation can be traced — via the evidence — to injection with the Pfizer and Moderna junk. Both of these needles can cause myocarditis. Not a mere “association.” Not “just” correlation. No, the needles can cause heart inflammation in otherwise healthy people.

And do.

For most reading this newsletter, this is not news or surprising. What is surprising is who said it — and when.

A school board committee? A local Republican Executive committee? A local corporate Board committee?

No.

The committee that drew this conclusion? Experts. Mainstream experts. Not “outcasts” like Peter McCullough, Pierre Kory, Joseph Ladapo, James Thorpe, Paul Marik, Ryan Cole, et al.

Experts in epidemiology, internal medicine, cardiology, gynecology, orthopedics, hematology, and on and on. Experts seen as the finest, the best this country’s got. They tell us.

These experts hail from some of the most prestigious and highly-respected institutions. These include Weill Cornell Medical School; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Medicine; the Mayo Clinic; Tufts University School of Medicine, and others.

Their experience spans actual medical practice, years of research within their fields, and stints within multiple institutions, including the National Institutes of Health (NIH). The very same NIH that Dr. Jay Bhattacharya has been nominated to lead…

So, unassailable pedigree, yes? So, what was this committee and from whence did it come?

Answer:

The National Academy of Sciences

---

An ad hoc committee of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) tells us Pfizer and Moderna injections can (and do) cause heart injury. Lifelong heart damage.

And…

Cue the crickets.

Chartered under Title 18 U.S. Code Chapter 1503, the National Academy of Sciences is the academy for all the country’s super dupers. The best in medicine, engineering, science.

To get in, one must be nominated by other super dupers already in the Academy. Then during their annual meeting in Washington, D.C., they vote on the nominees to join their club — an elite club. Membership in this academy is “a widely-accepted mark of excellence and considered one of the highest honors a scientist can receive.”

So. This is big stuff. These are some seriously serious people. Certainly, to be seriously considered and when they talk, listened to.

Except it’s hard to listen…when nobody — NOBODY — is saying anything.

Brief History of This Report

Back in mid-2023 — at the request of the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA)¹ — the NAS formed an ad hoc committee. The committee set out to study a list of 19 health effects of COVID “vaccines” and bodily harms from “general vaccination.” The list of 19 appears in the quote below.

The bodily harm to be reviewed — of general vaccines — was specific to shoulder injury. Here’s how the NAS put it:

The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine will convene an ad hoc committee to review the epidemiological, clinical, and biological evidence regarding the relationship between:

• COVID-19 vaccines and specific adverse events i.e. Guillain-Barrè Syndrome (GBS), chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), transverse myelitis (TM), Bell’s palsy, hearing loss, tinnitus, chronic headaches, infertility, sudden death, myocarditis/pericarditis, thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS), immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP), thromboembolic events (e.g., cerebrovascular accident (CVA), myocardial infarction (MI), pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis (DVT)), capillary leak syndrome, and

• intramuscular administration of vaccines and shoulder injuries.

The committee will make conclusions about the causal association between vaccines and specific adverse events.²

April 2024

After several months of work, the NAS issued its report in April 2024. The full report spans more than 200 pages. As the committee worked, reviewing available evidence, it produced interim reports. Fifteen different experts — separate from the ad hoc committee — conducted an independent review.

This review was to provide “candid and critical comments” to ensure that the final published report would “be as sound as possible” and meet the NAS’s high standards of evidence, objectivity, quality, and responsiveness.

The NAS also published a five-page Consensus Study Report with highlights of the committee’s findings. It is from that highlights report that I got the opening quote.

As part of its review, the committee formed varying degrees of causation, the first being evidence that confirms a causal relationship between injection and adverse event:

“Evidence establishes a causal relationship—The totality of the evidence suggests that vaccination can cause this harm. Further research is unlikely to lead to a different conclusion.” (Bold/italics added)

To me, the more important part of this standard is the second sentence. Study til the cows come home — and you won’t get a different outcome. “X” causes “Y.” Or can…

In the Consensus Study Report, you can see the other standards used by the committee in making determinations based on the evidence:

• Evidence favors acceptance of a causal relationship—The totality of the evidence suggests that vaccination might cause this harm, but meaningful uncertainty remains. Studies that better minimize bias and confounding, and studies that estimate effects more precisely, could lead to a different conclusion.

• Evidence is inadequate to accept or reject a causal relationship—The available evidence is too limited (e.g., few studies in humans, biased, imprecise) or inconsistent to draw meaningful conclusions in support of or against causality. Future research could lead to a different conclusion. This conclusion also applies to situations in which no studies were identified.

• Evidence favors rejection of a causal relationship

Notice the language — the qualifying language — of “acceptance” and “inadequate”?

Myocarditis

Their conclusion — “The committee concluded that evidence establishes a causal relationship between both BNT162b2 (Pfizer/BioNTech) and mRNA-1273 (Moderna) and myocarditis.”

Study this seven ways to Sunday? Get the same answer.

So. Not merely “favoring” acceptance of the causal relationship. Establishing it.

Boom!

Except? No boom.

Deafening silence instead.

---

On April 16, 2024, the NAS issued a press release announcing its “comprehensive” study.

Try as I might — maybe you’ll have better luck — I was unable to find more than one mainstream media outlet that picked up this press release and reported on it. One. MSN.

The title for this one mention?

“Only One Harm From mRNA COVID Vaccines, Report Determines”

Only one, so get over yourself. It’s just one.

But one that can last a lifetime. That harms a major organ…

Only one.

From a shot that fails to prevent you from getting the thing it’s named after or from transmitting it (if you believe in “transmission” or “catching” colds/flus, etc.).

Worth the risk?

If you read the MSN article, notice how fast the writer mentions the “one harm” and then just moves on…Nothing to see here. She glides over what should be monumental news and just moves on…

To talk about the other harms for which there was less certain evidence. Not none, just less certain for a number of reasons that the report admits.

No discussion at all about the admission — finally — of what so many doctors and others have been saying for how many years?

Nothing to see here.

How About Them Shoulders?

“A more general investigation also established a general causal relationship between intramuscular administration of routinely administered vaccines and various shoulder injuries:

• Subacromial/subdeltoid bursitis caused by direct injection into the bursa

• Acute rotator cuff or acute biceps tendinopathy caused by direct injection into or adjacent to a tendon

• Bone injury caused by direct injection into or adjacent to the bone

• Axillary or radial nerve injury caused by direct injection into or adjacent to the nerve

Hey, but if these needles can keep you from getting whatever, what’s a little myocarditis or bone or axillary nerve injury? Or subdeltoid bursitis? That sounds wonderful…

---

So, what came of this? Did this news make ABC, CBS, NBC, Fox, MSNBC, CNN, The NY Times — any of them? If you can find any — one! — please let me know. Doubt you will, though, which is no surprise, since this crime and its accomplices were brought to us by

And Moderna…Both of which created these “countermeasures” via the U.S. Department of Defense, but that’s a story for a different day.

1. The HRSA rolls up into the CDC, which is overseen by HHS. HRSA administers the VICP and the CICP, the vaccine injury compensation program and the countermeasure injury compensation program, respectively.

2. https://www.nationalacademies.org/en/our-work/review-of-relevant-literature-regarding-adverse-events-associated-with-vaccines#sectionCommittee